All Posts

For most certification and licensure programs in the US, the question of moving from paper to computer based delivery has already been settled. The professional engineering and surveying boards began their transition back in 2011. As recently as October 2025, a major cybersecurity credential moved to computer based adaptive testing. State education agencies continue to convert their assessments year over year. The direction of travel is clear. What separates a smooth conversi

When discussions about remote proctoring begin, technology is often the first topic on the table. AI flagging. Gaze tracking. Multi-angle monitoring. These capabilities matter. But many assessment programs increasingly discover that these may not be the hardest decision they face. The real challenge often emerges later when monitoring results must be interpreted, exceptions must be handled, candidate concerns must be addressed, and integrity decisions must be defended. At tha

The question assessment programs keep asking is whether students will accept online exams. That's the wrong question. The more useful one: what actually makes students feel comfortable taking one? Acceptance follows from that. Trust follows from that. And the willingness to come back follows from that too. Following our first U.S. higher-education pilot, we collected structured feedback from students who completed exams through the EzTest platform. Rather than just tallying s

Every credentialing director running remote exams faces the same challenge: AI proctoring has become the industry standard offering, but evaluating whether any given solution actually holds up is difficult. Vendors use similar language. Demos all look impressive. And the question of what happens when a result gets challenged — legally, procedurally, or by a disgruntled candidate — rarely comes up until it has to.